so to voice disapproval with a democratic candidate is akin to insubordination and should be punished in kind? hmmmm, in what type of society is free speech inhibited? hmmmmmmmmmmmm....... Please go to the nytimes politics website; their results page has many interesting graphics that show how obama does SO much better in largely African American counties as well as other info.
Cite some sources of authority please.
methinks..
Hey, Arky. Quit feeding the troll.
I think somebody else needs to be banned for unfounded accusations. I would just love to see you guess how old I really am and why my user name really is fitting.
Nah. Not interested.
Its obvious you feel ignored and disgusted. This whole thing is an internet meltdown cry for attention.
I feel for you, I do. But you're not helping Hillary, yourself, or anyone else.
same applies to you
Again, you're just looking for a fight and you admit it. There's nothing even approaching positive with you. You'd rather both sides go down just so you can keep swinging. If you haven't noticed, Hillary's got her priorities in check - she's supporting the Democratic nominee.
You gave me a freaking one?
You, the author? For asking you to cite some authority for your claims?
i GAVE sources, you self righteous antagonizer!!! (surveyusa, nytimes, etc. ) To link every single statement with an accompanying article is too much work to simply appease your desire to insult those who disagree with you. For that, it was necessary.
To link every statement and article is part of what goes into making a diary. You are either to lazy or making things up to suit your talking points.
Oh, that's hilarious. Keep it coming. Its just not worth linking to your sources? You don't even care enough about what you're talking about to "appease" people with some sort of proof you're not a ranting troll? You don't even care about the veneer of accuracy or logic, this diary is an excuse to fight and you just admitted it.
I have lost faith that I will EVER be able to convince ignorant and anctimonious people like you that I am not a Republican troll. Why should I waste my time trying to convince people like you of that simple truth? Again, if this were a pro-Obama diary, it would probably not have been t rated so many times. You just cannot accept differing opinions and there lies the root of your problem.
Differing opinions are absolutely fine.
Different facts are not.
You are entitled to the former, not the latter. If your facts are correct then you can do some cursory Googling, or Lexis'ing if you prefer, to educate us.
I don't know and don't care what your political affiliation is. You're a troll as in you're posting to start a fight. You don't care to back up your sources, you're fully contemptuous of the idea of even attempting to start out with an honest attempt at a dialog, you just want to rant in public, argue and insult people when they call you on it, and troll rate up and down the diary. You need a nap.
So all of you troll rating every single one of my rebuttals is perfectly acceptable? If a disagreement concerning who the better candidate is is considered trolling, I guess nobody is innocent then. I understand that you support BHO and I support HRC; it doesn't mean that i am a troll. Furthermore, the initial insults came from team Obama in the comments if you would deign to check
The initial insult, sirrah, was calling us "latte liberals" and so forth.
STOP PUTTING US INTO THESE LITTLE GROUPS.
that is not me, that is the media and many politcal analysts.....oh but di your heart desire specifics?
You quoted it, without attribution, as if it was a meaningful distinction.
If you don't tell us whose words you are using, we will assume they are yours.
I haven't troll rated you once. I can't.
You're also now trying to cast a complete meltdown diary made as an excuse to insult and troll rate people as a "disagreement". Sorry, you already admitted you're not interested in the alternative.
Oh, and never forget the handy parting shot of "he started it", like that excuses a grown person for acting like this. What kind of behavior is this to emulate? What do you expect when people call you out on it? Who's going to take you seriously when you admit you don't even care about it enough to take it seriously?
So, you're saying you can't be bothered to actually use some journalism skills and cite your sources?
If you are making claims with which the bulk of your audience will disagree it is incumbent on you to cite sources of authority such that we are persuaded.
Either you are trying to convince us of something, or you aren't.
I'm not being a dick here, either. If you want to editorialize, that's absolutely fine, but don't be shocked if it fails to change anyone's mind.
This isn't an Obama thing or a Clinton thing. If you're going to spout of some things you could reasonably expect us to object to, back it up!
And if you honestly didn't forsee it, don't get all sanctimonious when we ask that of you.
I'm not doing your research for you. I love how "back up your statement" is now a violation of freedom of speech. You have no shame.
show me a link to where I said those exact words and maybe your claim would have some merit. Otherwise just keep your nasty thoughts to yourself.
Do you have a memory problem? You don't understand how hyperlinking works? You're rattling off names of newspapers, not providing sources. And you write the entire concept off as "appeasement". You don't care about providing sources or backing up your statements, you just want to rant, argue with people, and troll rate them.
